<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://haverkamp.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Otherwise Occupied - classes</title>
 <link>http://haverkamp.com/taxonomy/term/230/9</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>&quot;Dergosits outline&quot;</title>
 <link>http://haverkamp.com/2007/10/12/dergosits-outline</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Someone came by here via the above &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=dergosits+outline&quot;&gt;Google search&lt;/a&gt;.  Twice, in fact.  It probably took a while to figure out why, because &lt;a href=&quot;http://haverkamp.com/2007/02/20/i-may-still-have-a-skull-full-of-mush&quot;&gt;the page it serves up from me&lt;/a&gt; is not very useful.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let me just say this, though.  I definitely recommend an outline, even though it was, for us, a 7-day take home.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why?  Well, I didn&#039;t make an outline.  I figured with all of my notes (marked up versions of the class notes he gave us for each class), my casebook, and my Schechter mini-treatise (which was a lifesaver) that the exam wouldn&#039;t be a problem.  Oh, was I wrong.  With each of the 25 multiple choice questions averaging around 30 minutes to &quot;confidently&quot; answer, I was already way beyond the 7-hour estimate he gave in class.  But I still had three essay questions to respond to.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I still did alright, if not great, but man... An ounce of prevention would have been great.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://haverkamp.com/2007/10/12/dergosits-outline#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/classes">classes</category>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/law-school">Law_School</category>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/outlines">outlines</category>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/patent-law">patent_law</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 19:29:08 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gregh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">583 at http://haverkamp.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bar electives and bar passage</title>
 <link>http://haverkamp.com/2007/09/24/bar-electives-and-bar-passage</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2007/09/24/law-school-curricula-passing-the-bar/?mod=hpp_us_blogs&quot;&gt;Law Blog - WSJ.com : Law-School Curricula &amp;amp; Passing the Bar&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do the classes law students take have any correlation to bar passage rates? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No, according to a new study highlighted on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/09/24/the-science-of-passing-the-bar-exam-does-first-year-torts-really-matter/&quot;&gt;NYT Freakonomics blog&lt;/a&gt;, run by ersthwhile lawyer and &lt;a href=&quot;http://opinionistas.com/&quot;&gt;Opinionistas&lt;/a&gt; blogger Melissa Lafsky (who has quite the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melissa_Lafsky&quot;&gt;Wikipedia entry&lt;/a&gt;). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://law.slu.edu/faculty/profiles/profile.asp?username=rushdk&quot;&gt;Douglas Rush&lt;/a&gt;, assistant dean at St. Louis Law, has co-written the paper scheduled for publication in the upcoming Journal of Legal Education and entitled &amp;ldquo;&lt;a href=&quot;http://law.bepress.com/expresso/eps/1889/&quot;&gt;Does Law School Curriculum Affect Bar Examination Passage?&lt;/a&gt;&amp;rdquo; The authors documented every student&amp;rsquo;s courseload for five different graduating classes at St. Louis Law, analyzing the number of bar topic courses taken against bar passage rates for first-time takers. There was virtually no correlation between law school courseloads and the bar passage rates.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s always a hot topic.  People are fanatical about it, and there&#039;s often little middle ground.  One camp believes bar electives are near mandatory; the other -- where I have been -- believes they&#039;re a waste of time given the breadth of the bar exam coverage and the time we will all be spending in BarBri.  Right now, I&#039;m considering only one bar elective, and I occasionally even have second thoughts about it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;People can return to this post and laugh if I don&#039;t pass.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://haverkamp.com/2007/09/24/bar-electives-and-bar-passage#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/barexam">barexam</category>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/bar-passage">bar_passage</category>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/classes">classes</category>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/law-school">Law_School</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:45:45 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gregh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">572 at http://haverkamp.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Registration?  Check.</title>
 <link>http://haverkamp.com/2007/06/27/registration-check</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Well, that was easy.  On Tuesday, I logged in for my priority appointment as a 4th year evening student.  Today, I logged in for my priority appointment as a 4th year student, which was also the same appointment for 3rd year students.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was fun to see the class count, to know which of my classes were popular.  Answer: some more than others.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I got everything I currently think I want.  I&#039;m still playing with ideas.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thumbs up for online registration.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://haverkamp.com/2007/06/27/registration-check#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/classes">classes</category>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/law-school">Law_School</category>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/registrar">registrar</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:33:09 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gregh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">506 at http://haverkamp.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
