<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://haverkamp.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Otherwise Occupied - barexam</title>
 <link>http://haverkamp.com/taxonomy/term/248/9</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Bar Results Waiting: Day 4</title>
 <link>http://haverkamp.com/2008/08/04/bar-results-waiting-day-4</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This is my second day back at work since the bar exam.  I came in Friday, but things were generally dead.  It&#039;s not dead today.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have not been keeping count of the number of people who ask me how I did on the bar exam.  I&#039;m not entirely sure how I wish to answer such questions.  I&#039;ve settled on, &quot;I think I did well enough to pass.&quot;  Does that sufficiently hedge?  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I just made the mistake of reading someone&#039;s breakdown of questions and issues, which suggests that I missed more issues that I had originally believed.  In particular, it appears that perhaps my Question #3 and Question #5 were weaker than I had originally believed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oh, man.  It&#039;s going to be a long wait until November 21.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://haverkamp.com/2008/08/04/bar-results-waiting-day-4#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/barexam">barexam</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:21:21 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gregh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">668 at http://haverkamp.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bar Exam: Day 3</title>
 <link>http://haverkamp.com/2008/07/31/bar-exam-day-3</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Three more essays, one more (seemingly) straightforward performance test, and the 2008 July California Bar Exam is done.  Now, I just have to wait until November 21 for results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And now, I guess I&#039;ve got to do something about this blog.  The title no longer really fits.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://haverkamp.com/2008/07/31/bar-exam-day-3#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/barexam">barexam</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:04:59 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gregh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">665 at http://haverkamp.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bar Exam: Day 2</title>
 <link>http://haverkamp.com/2008/07/30/bar-exam-day-2</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;California bar exam day 2.  Yay!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Day 2 is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbex.org/multistate-tests/mbe/&quot;&gt;Multistate Bar Exam&lt;/a&gt; (&quot;MBE&quot;), a 200-question multiple choice exam given in two 3-hour parts.  It&#039;s a tough patch of work, but nowhere near as exhausting as a performance test like yesterday&#039;s.  I feel a whole lot better today post-exam than I did yesterday.  On the other hand, the MBE&#039;s also a crapshoot.  I felt pretty good about some areas that had given me problems before (mortgages!), but as often occurs on the MBE, you find yourself down to 2 correct questions and must choose the &quot;best&quot; response.  I&#039;ve been convinced by a friend that on at least one of those questions, I chose incorrectly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I use one of the time management techniques suggested by Professor Sakai (a USF prof, and one of the Bar/Bri lecturers) to split the questions into blocks of 20, based on the size of the vertical columns on the answer sheet.  I budget 33 minutes per column, which leaves me with 15 minutes of buffer.  In the morning, I was running around 7 minutes behind going into the last block of 20.  In the afternoon, I had 55 minutes remaining going into the last block of 20.  Go figure.  It&#039;s all meaningless until I find out whether I pass or fail.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One more day to go.  There&#039;s plenty of anxiety about the remaining areas to be tested on the essay tomorrow.  There&#039;s also lots of speculation that after the basic performance test we got yesterday that tomorrow&#039;s may be harder.  I&#039;m not too bothered by that -- we had some toughies thrown at us in Legal Drafting, and I did best on those ones.  However, there&#039;s always the possibility of not doing best on those, and that&#039;s just losing the free points that should come from the performance tests.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://haverkamp.com/2008/07/30/bar-exam-day-2#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/barexam">barexam</category>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/mbe">mbe</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:42:28 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gregh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">664 at http://haverkamp.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The mechanics of the bar exam.</title>
 <link>http://haverkamp.com/2008/07/29/the-mechanics-of-the-bar-exam</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A bar taker breaks down the mechanics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.peterwall.net/index.php/2008/07/29/day-one-down-feels-like-two/&quot;&gt;Day One Down, Feels Like Two &lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyway, the test. In all the stuff I read beforehand, from various sites on the web, and in everything people told me, nobody really said what the exam is actually like, down to the nitty-gritty details. So I thought it might be helpful for some people to explain how it all goes down.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Other locations may be a little different. (E.g., in Los Angeles this morning there was an earthquake—a friend sent me a text message and said chandeliers were swinging and people were screaming during the third essay question). Here’s how it went down in San Mateo, July 2008.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s a good run-down of the process.  It&#039;s pretty much how it worked for us at the Oakland Convention Center, other than our absence of a huge parking lot; most people here are staying at the Marriott or across the street (where I am with hideous Internet service) at the Courtyard.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Others were smart and &lt;a href=&quot;http://abovesupra.blogspot.com/2008/07/lay-of-land.html&quot;&gt;scoped the place out&lt;/a&gt; ahead of time.  I just read the instructions and figured I&#039;d figure it out.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The person next to me on my right hurt her back last week, so she&#039;s constantly adjusting herself. I&#039;ve found the chair I&#039;m on is (surprisingly) comfortable for about 2 hours, after which time I crush the cushion under my mass and my tailbone suffers and I start shifting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And at the rate we&#039;re going, we&#039;re going to spend almost 3 hours just listening to instructions and announcements over the three days.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://haverkamp.com/2008/07/29/the-mechanics-of-the-bar-exam#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/barexam">barexam</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:06:03 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gregh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">663 at http://haverkamp.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bar Exam: Day 1</title>
 <link>http://haverkamp.com/2008/07/29/bar-exam-day-1</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The California bar exam is a three-day trial of one&#039;s patience.  I just finished day one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Today, like Thursday will be, was split into morning and afternoon sessions of essays.  In the three-hour morning session of both days, we have three essays on substantive areas of law. In the three-hour afternoon session, we have the &quot;performance test,&quot; which is hard to explain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I thought this morning&#039;s essays were relatively straightforward, though the third, a contracts question, gave me more fits than I anticipated such a question would.  I thought I had put my contracts difficulties behind me.  The three questions potentially covered (and ostensibly, eliminated from possibility Thursday) three areas of law.  However, I&#039;m not sure that the second question was truly a cross-over or not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The performance test was straightforward enough to make me worry that I did something horribly wrong.  Time will tell on that one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Finally... Sheesh.  It seems like two days have passed in less than one full day.  But half the hard part (the essays) is over.  Bring on the MBEs.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://haverkamp.com/2008/07/29/bar-exam-day-1#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/barexam">barexam</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:00:51 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gregh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">662 at http://haverkamp.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bar Review: The End</title>
 <link>http://haverkamp.com/2008/07/28/bar-review-the-end</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Today&#039;s it.  Day 63 of bar review.  Ready or not, the bar exam is tomorrow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I wish I could tell whether or not I&#039;m ready.  Every conversation seems to bring up some rule I don&#039;t know -- or haven&#039;t even heard of.  On the plus side, I&#039;m not always the one at a loss.  &quot;If you don&#039;t know it, fake it.&quot;  That&#039;s the aim.  Here&#039;s hoping I hit the target.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m kind of looking forward to going back to work on Friday.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://haverkamp.com/2008/07/28/bar-review-the-end#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/barexam">barexam</category>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/bar-studying">bar_studying</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:42:13 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gregh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">661 at http://haverkamp.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bar Review: Day 60</title>
 <link>http://haverkamp.com/2008/07/25/bar-review-day-60</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The question I keep going over in my head: Is there something I would not be able to write some sort of essay response on?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Short answer: I don&#039;t think so.  Longer answer: I worry about freezing up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During this process, we&#039;ve seen nothing but very good essays as answer exemplars.  I really want to know what a 55 looks like, what a 65 looks like, and what a 75 looks like.  I feel that seeing only 80s or 85s (or whatever they are, since we don&#039;t know) makes it too hard to know what we should do when we fake it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Or, maybe I actually don&#039;t want to know.  I sure think I do, though.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://haverkamp.com/2008/07/25/bar-review-day-60#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/barexam">barexam</category>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/bar-studying">bar_studying</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:43:28 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gregh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">660 at http://haverkamp.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bar Review: Day 58</title>
 <link>http://haverkamp.com/2008/07/23/bar-review-day-58</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It would be really great if there could be just a few more minor, piddly little distinctions between California civil procedure and California evidence and the FRE and FRCP.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://haverkamp.com/2008/07/23/bar-review-day-58#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/barexam">barexam</category>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/bar-studying">bar_studying</category>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/civil-procedure">civil_procedure</category>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/evidence">evidence</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:58:50 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gregh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">659 at http://haverkamp.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bar Review, Day 56</title>
 <link>http://haverkamp.com/2008/07/21/bar-review-day-56</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Will the 29th hurry up and get here?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Someone mentioned to me that the bar exam is an endurance test, what with 3 days and all.  I responded that I&#039;m not so sure it&#039;s the three days I&#039;m bothered by; it&#039;s the 63 days of prep ahead of it.  I am so sick and tired of bar prep now.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://haverkamp.com/2008/07/21/bar-review-day-56#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/barexam">barexam</category>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/bar-studying">bar_studying</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:51:18 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gregh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">657 at http://haverkamp.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bar Review: Day 49</title>
 <link>http://haverkamp.com/2008/07/14/bar-review-day-49</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Today was the simulated written exam.  I did the morning (the essays) and skipped out on the performance test.  I&#039;ll hit a few performance tests in the waning days to make sure I haven&#039;t forgotten anything about doing them.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(The beauty of Legal Drafting, unlike even the other so-called &quot;bar electives,&quot; is that Legal Drafting is entirely geared to prepare you for one whole section of the bar exam.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Written exam went well, largely, given where I am with respect to studying for essays.  Based on the grading criteria, I&#039;d say one answer fell in the &quot;above average&quot; category and the other two solidly in the passing category.  12 more topics and a lot more practice essays remain.  I feel like it&#039;s coming together.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://haverkamp.com/2008/07/14/bar-review-day-49#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/barbri">barbri</category>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/barexam">barexam</category>
 <category domain="http://haverkamp.com/topics/bar-studying">bar_studying</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:02:23 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gregh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">656 at http://haverkamp.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
